Toxic Exposure: Who Is Liable?

There are certain situations where it is absolutely evident who is to blame for your injury. However, determining liability in toxic exposure instances might be much more difficult. You may want to consult with an expert toxic exposure lawyer in Jersey City to understand your legal alternatives and defend your right to seek compensation for your injuries.

 

The Manufacturer 

According to the standards of ‘strict product responsibility’, a plaintiff does not have to establish that a manufacturer was negligent; instead, they just have to show that the manufacturer’s product was unreasonably harmful to consumers. Companies that created, produced, marketed, or provided such goods may be held accountable in a strict liability lawsuit. You may also be able to sue the manufacturer for negligence, breach of warranty, or, in certain cases, deliberate, unlawful behavior on the manufacturer’s part.

 

The Supplier

A supplier or distributor may be held liable for your injuries even if the supplier or distributor did not manufacture the product in question in the first place. If you have been injured due to someone else’s negligence, one of the most crucial questions is whether the provider had a “duty of care” to protect you from being exposed to toxins. When it comes to giving proper warnings and safety information, this duty of care may be demanding. Another option is to avoid selling the goods at any cost in some instances.

 

Contractors and other third-parties

It’s possible that someone else was responsible for your harm by introducing you to a dangerous chemical. Consider the following scenario: If a contractor is hired to remove insulation from your home and carelessly exposes you to asbestos contained inside the insulation, the contractor may be liable for any injuries you get due to the asbestos exposure.

See also  What are the Different Types of Pedestrian Accidents Most Common in Portland?

 

The Company You Work For

A workers’ compensation claim will be filed in most situations where an employee is harmed at work due to hazardous exposure. This is in place of bringing a lawsuit against your company. There are certain exceptions to this rule. You may still be able to collect damages against a third party; nevertheless, you should consult with an experienced attorney to learn more about your options.

 

Any legal case may be challenging, but a chemical exposure lawsuit may include delving into previous corporate records and other documentation to demonstrate causation and culpability and the science of demonstrating that the chemical caused the harm.

You may also like...